Totally lost what remained of my faith.
I'll keep this sort. I had little-to-none hope left for Ole, but after tonight's result, it's all gone and won't be coming back anymore. After watching the UCL semi-final between Real Madrid vs Chelsea, I came to a conclusion, that the 'engine' of the team is the coach. Right now, we have a semi-working engine. One that one moment reaches 120km/h, and another barely reaches 40km/h. Many prefer to go slow to reach their destination safely, but sometimes you need to risk a little and push on the pedal to be on time. That's where experience comes in and plays it's role. You have to know when to risk in order not to over do it. Chelsea's team is an expensive squad, no doubt about that, but were they any good under Lampard, who's as inexperienced as Ole? No! They wouldn't be here, that's for sure. What happened when an experienced coach came in and took charge? UCL Final, here I come. I hope they also win if we're being honest with ourselves. I'd hate to watch Man City coming on top with this particular trophy. EPL is inevitably lost. Game Over and try again next year. But with such low quality engine, I don't see things working out, especially if we combine the transfer budget we have for this summer, which is non-exist. Anyway, that's what I wanted to point out. I know many will dislike my post, but it won't change the fact that Ole is here because of the treble winning goal.
Comments
Hi Nick, I need your factual source and data for the following: 1. Lampard will 100% not going to reach the UCL Final 2. Ole is a "low quality engine" 3. We have a non-existant transfer budget 4. If Ole didnt score "that goal" that he won't be here with us.
1. If he was good, or what the club wanted, he would still be here. 2. He proved that he can not make the right selection when it matters, nor the correct substitution on time to change the game. 3. Multiple sources indicate that our badget this years is very low, around 100M, which is a single good player -or multiple mediocre- given the today standards. 4. That doesn't even need to be analyzed. What did he achieve as a coach to be worth the spot as Man Utd coach, one of the 2 top English Football clubs and one of the best in Europe? He would be a very good DoF, a very good coach for promoting youth. But to coach the senior team, where you need to outsmart your opponent, make tactical decisions, he got none of that and doubt he will get better.
Hm you have again lost the point. Perhaps that is your facts but in my opinion, and i do not have hard facts or data to prove this: 1. No one person could have been sure that Lampard would not get into UCL final if he stayed. Unless you have a time machine, and run the scenario, I doubt anyone can be sure on this. But hey, these are our opinion and obviously you know better because you have the facts and data to back you up. 2. Again, in my opinion, he has not proven to be inadequate in this area. Read Matt's response to your facts and data. Be gentle on him because it is only his opinion as oppose to your cold hard facts though. 3. 100m, in my opinion, 100m is factually existantent. In my opinion, 0 is non-existent but perhaps your fact is right in saying 100m is equal to non-existent. 4. His appointment is tied to him being a good servant to the club and his previous ties no doubt. But in my opinon, he would have probably gotten the interim job after Jose whether he scored "that goal" or not. He did a good job in Molde, was available, a good candidate for interim, came in and did a fantastic job before the board appoint him as permanent manager. Now your fact says he wont get the job if he didnt score "that goal". My opinion is that he probably will. But who am i to argue with someone backed by facts and data collected through probable scenarios right? 😉😉
So let's agree to disagree, and I'll be a very happy man If I didn't see your name again in any of my posts, and I'll do the same with yours. Cheers
Sure. When you lay down facts and data, I'm sure you are right all the time and dislike anyone who tries to question facts and data with personal opinions.
I'll give you some facts and data since you're so into numbers. I'm rating 11.77 and rank 17 on Tribuna. All those likes that got me here, are from comments that were respectful towards others, even when I was saying Ole out. You're ironic towards me the whole time, but I never answered, not because I'm stupid or didn't understand it, but because I gave you a 2nd chance to make it right. Not only you didn't, but you're keeping it up. Like I said, I don't want to see your name on my post if possible. I'm asking you politely. You don't know me, so if you had the need to argue with me, at least you could be polite. Since you can't do it, there is no reason for me to ever answer to you again.
See that is where you got it wrong, I haven't been disrespectful. I disputed all your facts and data to have you realise and admit that opinions and facts are very different. Facts are factual, not some mere opinion that you believe strongly and thus thinking it is right. Facts are proven, not opined. Alot of your facts are infact your opinion so try to understand the difference. I have not been impolite and if you think i dolid then i apologize. Disputing what you say, in whatever manner i chose to, are not being impolite. Answer or not answer me all you want but since you asked politely for me to avoid you, I will avoid posts that you are making that is neutral, factual, opinionated. But I won't for a second keep my silence if you are putting your opinion as fact which is misleading and arrogant. Also i don't need your second chance, not here to befriend you or have you agree with me. My replies to you are all based on your facts which I find absolutely disputable and dispute i will. Unless you can prove otherwise, then it is not a fact. Fact and opinion differs, get that in your head.
Yes, sensei. I'll treasure your advices forever within me.
Now this i like, brushing me off with sarcasm rather asking me to avoid commenting on things i dont agree to. Cheers.
Well I kind of beg to differ on a few things.. First, Chelsea reaching the finals of CL is partly because of Lampard as well.. The team was not kicked out of CL under Lampard, so you cannot give all the credit to Tuchel. Secondly, Tuchel has not been able to really improve Chelsea’s premier league position. As a matter of fact, they are even quite close to miss the top four Lastly, I would say that it is all a matter of priority.. Lampard was prioritizing both the league and the CL whereas Tuchel seems to be focussing more on the CL..
Does it change the fact the we got kicked out while we were 1st on our group? I think not.
Do you really think United would have gone as far as in the Europa league if they were still in the CL?
Are we a Europa League team now all of a sudden?
All of a sudden?? Face the reality mate.. it’s been the case ever since SAF left.. OGS is just rebuilding.. And I think he’s on the right track..
Everyone's entitled to their opinion. I think that even if backed in the summer with whatever money glazers will spend, he still lose in crucial matches and disqualify from cups due to lack of tactics. Running and counter attacking ain't tactics.
I respect your opinion mate.. let’s just agree to disagree.. we’re all United fans after all.. 👍
Fact: Running and counter attacking is infact a tactic. 🤔
No story for Ole next season not to compete with big team @ any level & win Trophies for United bicos we hv all what it takes bring down any team in this world with just 2 new signing. what matters most now is his tactics & how to used players rightly.